Free benchmark · ~5 minutes

How mature is your organisation at integrating geopolitics into daily decisions?

A 10-question diagnostic for executives and risk teams. Benchmark your function against the five levels of geopolitical maturity — from ad-hoc news monitoring to a fully integrated operating system.

Start the assessment How it works

10 questions · 4 dimensions · A 5-level maturity score with personalised next steps.

What we measure

Four dimensions of a real geopolitical function.

Governance & Ownership

Who owns geopolitical risk. Mandate, seniority, accountability.

Process & Cadence

How geopolitics shows up in weekly, monthly and committee rhythms.

Data & Tooling

Sources, system of record, signal-to-decision pipeline.

Decision Integration

Whether geopolitical insight actually changes capital, supply chain and strategic choices.

The Maturity Ladder

From ad-hoc news to a geopolitical operating system.

Ad-hoc

Geopolitics is news, not input. Decisions react to headlines. There is no owner, no rhythm, and no shared way to talk about geopolitical risk.

Aware

Leadership pays attention. Process does not. Senior leaders track major events, but coverage is uneven and depends on individuals. There is no shared framework or system of record.

Defined

A function exists. Workflows are still being built. An owner and basic framework exist, but adoption is inconsistent across business units and analysis is mostly manual.

Managed

Geopolitics is in the operating rhythm. Shared vocabulary, defined process, and a real system of record. Insight reaches decisions, but the function still depends on key individuals.

Integrated

Geopolitics is a system, not a person. AI-augmented workflows continuously inform decisions across business units. Geopolitics is a system of record on par with finance and risk.

See where you stand in 5 minutes.

You'll get a maturity level, a radar chart across the four dimensions, and 3–5 concrete next steps to move up.

Start the assessment